Federation comparison

Federation Software Comparison: ITF, WT and Independent Schools

April 20269 min readComparison

ITF and WT taekwondo look similar from outside but their competition formats, scoring rules and software needs are wildly different. If you run events for either — or for an independent school that mixes both — here is what you actually need from your competition manager.

ITF Taekwon-Do

ITF (International Taekwon-Do Federation) events typically include four disciplines: sparring, patterns, special technique, and power breaking. Sparring uses semi-contact rules with foot and hand protection, judged on points by 4 corner judges. Patterns are compared head-to-head with judges showing flags. Special technique and power breaking are judged on board breaks and height/reach.

Key software needs for ITF: multi-discipline support per fighter (one entry, four events), patterns scoring with head-to-head flag judging, breaking score recording with multiple attempts, and category cross-referencing across disciplines.

WT (World Taekwondo)

WT (formerly WTF) events use full-contact electronic body protector scoring with PSS (Protector and Scoring System) for sparring. Patterns (Poomsae) are increasingly popular as a separate event with its own world championships. Most senior WT events use 3-round sparring with an 8-second knockdown count and electronic head guards on the higher levels.

Software needs for WT: integration with PSS scoring units (or manual override), Poomsae scoring (5-judge mean-average system, drop highest and lowest), and weight categories aligned with WT standards (Fin, Fly, Bantam, Feather, Light, Welter, Middle, Heavy).

Independent schools

Independent schools — TAGB, ITC, BTC, BUTF and dozens of smaller organisations — borrow rules from both. Most use ITF-style sparring with WT-style category structures. The software need is flexibility: you cannot lock the tool to a single ruleset.

Software comparison

Most off-the-shelf tools commit to one federation. TKD Competition Manager is intentionally federation-agnostic. The bracket and scoring engines work with any ruleset because they treat scoring as a generic input — points, flags, time, breaks — and let the operator decide how to interpret them.

For federation-scale events with national rankings and squad implications, read our federation management guide.

Quick decision matrix

Stop fighting your spreadsheet.

Run brackets, scoring and rings in one place — from £39 per event.

See plans & pricing →